Home » Blog » Abduction and Forced Marriage Self-Defense Case

Abduction and Forced Marriage Self-Defense Case

Authored By: Birhan Asmare Adane

Bahirdar University

  1. Case Title & Citation 

Case Title: Abduction and Forced Marriage Self-Defense Case 

Citation: Federal High Court of Ethiopia, Criminal Bench 

  1. Court Name & Bench 

Court: Federal High Court of Ethiopia 

Bench: Criminal Bench 

Judge: Meaza Ashenafi 

  1. Date of Judgment 

January 2, 2015 

  1. Parties Involved 

Petitioner: Public Prosecutor 

Respondent/Defendant: 14-year-old girl (name withheld for privacy)

         5. Facts of the Case 

The defendant, a 14-year-old girl, was abducted for the purpose of forced marriage (telefa). 

She was confined, threatened, and subjected to coercion to compel marriage without consent. 

During an escape attempt, she shot her abductor using a firearm obtained during the struggle. 

Authorities arrested her and charged her with homicide. 

  1. Issues Raised 

Whether the killing constituted lawful self-defense under Ethiopian criminal law.

Whether customary practice (telefa) mitigates criminal responsibility.

Alignment with constitutional guarantees under Article 35 of the FDRE Constitution.

  1. Arguments of the Parties 

Prosecution: 

The killing was unlawful and disproportionate. 

Non-lethal alternatives might have existed. 

The act constituted intentional homicide. 

Defense: 

The girl faced an imminent and grave threat to life and bodily integrity.

Lethal force was necessary and proportionate given the circumstances.

Customary practices cannot override criminal law and human rights obligations. 

  1. Judgment / Final Decision 

The court acquitted the defendant, recognizing the killing as justified self-defense under exigent circumstances. 

  1. Legal Reasoning 

Immediacy and continuity of threat satisfied the self-defense requirement.

Proportionality and necessity justified lethal force given age and confinement.

Customary practice (telefa) cannot override constitutional and criminal law protections. 

Court reasoning anticipated Article 35 of the FDRE Constitution.

       10. Conclusion 

This landmark case affirmed that harmful customs cannot excuse violence and reinforced Ethiopia’s trajectory toward rights-based adjudication of GBV. 

Reference(S): 

Feminist Majority Foundation, Ethiopia Appoints Women’s Rights Champion to Head Supreme Court (2018). 

UN Women Constitutions Database, Ethiopia: Constitution of the FDRE (1995) — Article 35

Tigist Shewarega Hussen, Empowering the nation, disempowering women: The case of Kitcha Customary Law in Ethiopia.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top